Task #3786 (new)
Rendering Def part of the model?
| Reported by: | jburel | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | Future |
| Component: | Model | Keywords: | schema-2012-06, hold |
| Cc: | jamoore, cxallan, ajpatterson | Remaining Time: | n.a. |
| Sprint: | n.a. | Resources: | n.a. |
| References: | n.a. | Referenced By: | n.a. |
Description
To support Big image, we will need to adjust the rendering settings.
- viewport
- zoom level
- other?
References
| Referenced by: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change History
comment:3 Changed 16 months ago by jburel
Do we want to consider/discuss that ticket for 4.4? Probably only part of the OMERO model. It will be similar to ROI. so maybe we can close it. Discussions about common rendering started in Dresden
comment:4 Changed 15 months ago by jmoore
J-M: I would think we should at least discuss it, and rather soon, for inclusion in the 4.4 DB upgrades.
comment:5 Changed 15 months ago by jburel
Having ability to save information for big images will be useful but we probably need more feedback/usage. Moving the RenderingDef to the OME model now is probably not the right time, especially if we start using the code from Edi group.
comment:6 Changed 15 months ago by jmoore
Makes sense, J-M, but if we know that there's anything we will need regardless of new server implementations, we should likely make those incremental changes now, since we intend to have this DB version around for some time.
comment:7 Changed 15 months ago by jburel
In that case the 2 things for big images I can see to avoid numerous calls to the server:
- level
- viewer port bounds
This will also improve the synchronization between the 2 clients.
comment:8 Changed 15 months ago by jmoore
- Owner set to ajpatterson
- Milestone changed from Unscheduled to OMERO-Beta4.4
Andrew, can you get this scheduled/linked into the rest the schema upgrade tickets, etc?
comment:9 Changed 15 months ago by jburel
Adding the new value to the rendering Def in DB ok, modeling probably not especially if we decide to use the work done by Edi.
comment:10 Changed 15 months ago by jmoore
Except that we are trying to minimize differences, right? Is this something that would go in omero.xsd?
comment:11 Changed 15 months ago by jburel
omero ok I understood you wanted to promote it to the top level.
comment:12 Changed 12 months ago by jburel
- Cc dzmacdonald removed
- Milestone changed from OMERO-Beta4.4 to OMERO-Beta4.5
We need discussion with various groups: imageJ2, knime, imglib etc. so we have one common place. Pushing to 4.5
comment:13 Changed 4 months ago by ajpatterson
- Keywords schema-2012-06, hold added
On hold pending reintegration code changes from schema-2012-06 branch
Pushing this ticket, we will need to feedback first.